The mass of riots in London, spreading to Birmingham, Liverpool, Bristol, has left many wondering whether or not the city is fit to host the 2012 Olympic Games.
THE RIOTS WERE TOUCHED-OFF by a police killing. False rumors spread that Mark Duggan was gunned down executive-style by law enforcement. But protestors say the country-wide outcry goes far beyond that.
LONDON ERUPTED because British Prime Minister David Cameron cut social programs to the bone in a desperate attempt to reduce the nation's debt. Anger has been rising ever since. British media has been reporting discontent among the poor in urban areas, specifically where the latest riots brokeout. Back in June, nearly 50% of the public schools in Britain were shutdown by an enormous demonstration, nearly 800,000 strong, against public pensions being slashed.
Britain is economically stressed, creating a tinder-box of anger and resentment that erupted in voilence.
IT IS ALL VERY SCARY, BUT UNDERSTANDABLE. The middle-class and the poor are carrying the burden of bringing Britain back to solvency. They're being sequeezed at a time when they are already struggling to meet basic needs; groceries, rent, clothing their children. This burden is a bitter pill to swallow when the upper-class, the truly wealthy, seemingly remain unaffected.
THIS ISSUE IS NOT UNIQUE TO LONDON. With more riots erupting across the world because of econmonic hardships, a global push-back is mounting among the masses, bringing them into the streets.
PROTESTS ACROSS THE GLOBE: China has been hit by aggressive inflation, increasing 12%, affecting food and fuel. Of the few reports that get out, we know thousands of cab drivers in Southern China stopped traffic, congesting cites over the fuel prices. In March, in Portugal, nearly 200,000 protested spending cuts to social services. In May, in Spain, thousands protested over the 21% unemployment rate. In June, riots brokeout in Greece after the government voted for another round of deep cuts in social services.
I "DO NOT" THINK LONDON IS UNFIT TO HOST THE 2012 OLYMPICS. The issue is obviously global. However, I do believe it's difficult to watch the pagentry of the Olympics, knowing Bristish pounds have been spent to make it glorious, when your family is struggling financially.
THE OLYMPICS IS "SEEN" AS A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE ELITE, the ruling elite; multi-national corporations, government leaders, powerful non-profits. I wish that wasn't the case. The heart of the movement, the day-to-day, is driven by thousands of volunteers, chaities, and dedicated moms and dads who understand one truth:
SPORT IS A WAY TO A BETTER LIFE.
Sports teach you discipline, confidence, teamwork. For me, personally, the Olympic Dream was a way out of financial hardships.
I came from a lower middle-class family that periodically dipped below the poverty line. My parents couldn't afford to send me to competitions or pay for my education. Friends, coaches and swimming clubs supported me financially along the way. (I also recieved government support; free school lunch, healthcare.) Excelling in athletics meant more opportunity, a college schollarship, and, ultimately, the means to support my own family.
I AM UNSETTLLED BY THE RIOTS because the Olympics is seen as flashpoint, feared by organizers and governments to be a potential platform for the disenfranchised to demonstration with more volience. Instead, the Olympics could be, and should be, a vehicle for hope. As of today, the biggest story is Are the athletes safe? Would they they feel safe competing in London?
I WISH THE WORLD SAW THE OLYMPICS as a movement that supported the hopes and dreams of the poor and middle class. I wish the Olympic community made it a top priorty to reach-out to the economically disadvantaged first and foremost. They already do, to a degree, but their efforts are, understandably, sports-specific (and I'm sure I'll recieve emails about other examples). However, that's not the message that's coming across for the International Olympic Committee (IOC).
A MASSIVE EFFORT TO DO GOOD--good where there is no hint of a return; development of future Olympic athletes, positive media for corporate sponsors who will renew their partnerships--would make the Olympic movement far stronger.
WHAT IF THE IOC FOCUSED ITS GOODWILL on the upcoming host city? For three or four years leading up to the Games, the Olympic community could make specific efforts in the poorest parts of the host city to support sustanted job opportunites, education, shelters, food banks. What if the Olympic community made an investment in the least among the city's popluation, leaving them better off than before?
THE IOC COULD RAISE EXTRADINARY SUMS for an effort like this, for every host city. Rio could be the first. It could be an positive narrative woven through the Olympic telecast. The human story is what makes the Olympics satisfying and uplifting to watch. In the best stories, we identify with the athlete who has come out of suffering and achieved success. The IOC could be a champion for the disadvantaged in the host city, helping them to lift themselves out of poverty.
I could be wrong, have misplaced guilt over others suffering. Maybe it's not the Olympic Committee's place to do good. But I do believe the Olympic Committee is a guest in each host city, and if your host is distressed, you should standup and offer help.